The core directional assertion — that Trump's net worth has grown dramatically since the start of his second administration — is substantially correct and well-supported by multiple independent sources. Rattner's own May 1, 2026 Morning Joe segment, the explicit attribution source for Psaki's claim, established that Trump's net worth grew from approximately $2.34 billion in 2024 to an estimated $6.5 billion in 2026, a 2.78x increase. The problem is the word 'tripled': Rattner himself consistently used 'nearly tripled' in his own X post, his article body, and his website write-up of the segment — the unqualified 'triples' appears only in the MS NOW video page headline, not in Rattner's authored characterization. Psaki's substitution of 'tripled' for 'nearly tripled' is an identifiable, specific inaccuracy: $6.5B is approximately 17% short of the $7.02B threshold required for a true tripling from the $2.34B baseline. This does not reverse the directional meaning — the core point (enormous, unprecedented wealth accumulation) survives intact — satisfying the MOSTLY TRUE boundary test (per Section 4, MOSTLY TRUE requires the core assertion to be substantially correct with an identifiable inaccuracy that does not reverse directional meaning). Higher Forbes estimates ($7.3B as of September 2025) technically would constitute tripling, but Rattner's operative broadcast figure was $6.5B, making those estimates inapplicable to Psaki's claim as broadcast. The inaccuracy is modest in magnitude but precise in origin: it is a direct, verifiable misquotation of Rattner's own careful qualifier, not a rounding imprecision.