The broadcast is a direct attribution claim: Bret Baier asserts that Governor Tate Reeves made a specific statement with specific figures. The critical evaluative question for an attribution claim is whether the attributed statement was in fact made, not whether the underlying data in the statement was itself accurate. Fox Weather [1] directly quotes Gov. Reeves using materially identical language: "17 people have been injured and more than 300 homes have been damaged across several counties," confirming the attribution is accurate. The 17-injury figure is corroborated by the primary institutional record. MEMA's official Update #1 [2] lists exactly 17 injuries across three counties. On the "300+ homes" figure, this was Reeves' own publicly stated aggregate at the time of broadcast; Fox Weather's headline and article reflect this as his stated figure. The fact that Reeves himself later posted county-level data on the morning of May 7 showing approximately 487 homes is relevant to the accuracy of his underlying estimate, but does not retroactively make Baier's attribution of Reeves' earlier statement false. That statement was made and is confirmed. Applying the standard for immaterial imprecision: "more than 300" is directionally confirmed even by later revised figures (400 to 500+ range), so the figure is a directional understatement rather than a factual error in the attribution. Under attribution claim evaluation, the test is the accuracy of the attributed statement, not the real-time accuracy of the underlying data cited by the official. Since Reeves demonstrably said this, and all material elements are confirmed, the claim satisfies the TRUE standard: the core assertion is fully supported, and any imprecision in Reeves' underlying estimate does not make Baier's attribution of that statement inaccurate. Minimum source requirements for TRUE are met with a Tier 1 MEMA primary institutional source [2] plus multiple independent Tier 4 sources [1][4][5][6].